Ward Moore’s most famous novel opens with a wonderful
paragraph of just two sentences:
“Although I am writing this in the
year 1877, I was not here until 1921. Neither the dates nor the tenses are error—let me explain:”
--Chapter 1. Life in the Twenty-Six
States
That opening chapter is in fact a whirlwind of speculative
alternate history wonder. It details a history of the Civil War where the South
won and the North grew embittered, complaining even seventy years later. In the
North the people tend to have indenture themselves to get ahead (although this
isn’t fully explained why since it isn’t to go by ship to a different country).
But it is apparently extremely difficult to get ahead.
The narrator is a clumsy farmhand for his family although he
does come to a love of writing. Trackless locomotives, minibles (small
dirigibles, it seems), and the post-office lottery sparkle in this strange new
America which is plagued by poverty, indentured and prison labor, and gangs.
The telegraph is still the main mode of communication. America’s new future (of
the past) creates ripples of changes throughout the world where France still
appears to carry out Napoleonic wars.
He briefly comes across a slave pursued by his master and he
laments not jerking the horseman’s reins to give the slave a chance to escape.
This becomes a key thematic moment about the ability to change the future.
Two women manage to train our narrator into a professorial
writer who charts the course of Civil War. When he gets stuck, they help get
back in the saddle by the invention of a new time machine with a chance to
witness the past.
The novel dives into discussions of polygamous sexuality and
gender and racial equality—possibly one of the first in the genre to do so. It
is perhaps too didactic about these issues, however. Compare this to his story “Lot”
which leaves much to readers to discover for themselves.
An early version first of the tale appeared in a presumably
shorter form in F&SF, edited by Anthony
Boucher and J. Francis McComas. This version was later reprinted by Frank D.
McSherry, Jr., Charles G. Waugh, Martin H. Greenberg, and Harry Turtledove—one billed
as The Best Alternate History Stories of
the Twentieth Century. Dozens of critics and writers have recommended the
novel version. Gollancz reprinted it as part of their SF Masterworks series.
David Pringle included it in his Science
Fiction: The 100 Best Novels. And it is discussed in various critical
anthologies.
Nonetheless, the F&SF
novella version, edited by Boucher and McComas, may be the best version though
I haven’t laid my hands on a copy to investigate. The novel has discursive and
abstract passages that bog the middle part of the novel down:
“I noticed however that he treated the consul no
differently, either in politeness or honesty, from his other patrons, and by
this time I knew Tyss well enough to attribute this courtesy not to the
self-interest of a tradesman but to that compassion which he suppressed so
sternly under the contradictions of his nature.”
and
“The new Catty was no more than the old was disingenuous or
coquettish. She was simply mature, dignified, self-contained and just a trifle
amusedly aloof. Also she was very busy. She did not pretend to any interest in
other men; at the same time she had clearly outgrown her childish dependence on
me. She refused any competition with Barbara. When I sought her out she was
there, but she made no attempt to call me to her.”
Being trapped in a narrator’s semi-rambling thoughts for too
long didn’t seriously mar his short fiction, but here it quagmired the
narrative until the narrator was able to climb into a time machine. Thank God
for time machines.
One might guess that he had planned to expand on these, or
maybe the novel was too long to publish in 1953 that he compressed them without
little grace. The middle has aspects to recommend it, but an expansion may not
have improved the speculative aspects, so a ruthless excision (e.g. the
novella) may be the best choice for aesthetic readers.
That said, the novel remains an established, influential
classic, worth discovering for yourself. The intriguing ending, for instance, leaves
the reader to wonder which future the narrator lands in. Also, the novel demonstrates
how a small action (or inaction) can lead to devastating or beneficial effects.
The novel’s merits and charms may overwhelm infelicities for some. I will await
a cheap price on the Turtledove ebook before investigating the novella.
It is time someone collected his best short fiction—perhaps even
this novella—into a book. Moore’s stories are difficult to chase down.
The Author
Ward Moore won no awards or nominations yet was respected by writers. Despite the appearance in several best-of anthologies, he seems to have never had a collection. Apparently, he appears as a character in books by Kenneth Rexroth, himself, and Jean Ariss. He is also well known as the author of the critically acclaimed
stories, "Lot" and "Lot’s Daughter", which I discussed here.