Like many SF writers from previous generations, Margaret St.
Clair is overlooked. Even all-consuming critics like John Clute miss out on some of St.
Clair’s strengths (see his commentary at SFE)
although he astutely points out her “work was at times daringly subversive of
some of the central impulses of Genre SF.”
In the past, I’ve taken a look at a few classic story by Margaret St. Clair and hope to do so in the future. She is a writer of
economy, rarely overwriting—often writing her best work at the short-short or
short-story length, a length that is sadly underestimated in the field, baring
just enough ice to suggest the berg below. Reading The Hole in the Moon and Other Tales, one realizes that she can
cram in that finite space a fine imagination to boot. She may take the germ of
an idea for a lesser story and then takes it into several new directions,
sometimes implying world’s from mere suggestions. If that doesn’t impress you,
her endings tend to stick although the complexity and ambiguities sometimes
tangle with too much to wrestle. Occasionally, she could have used a good
editor to hash out the ideas.
Not too too long after St. Clair started published, James
Blish initiated his critical article series as William Atheling (see The Issue in Hand). He said that the
market was flooded with thirty magazines, publishing a lot of stories without
“technique.” This was what he aimed to correct in his series. On the other
hand, this created a fine training ground for many writers to grow up in.
Undoubtedly, bad writers forever wrote badly, but some improved over time.
St. Clair, in her introduction to her Best of collection—a very humble if too brief recollection of a
rough home life highlighted only by two kind uncles (if only she’d shared more
so we could compare and contrast her life with her story “The Little Red
Owl”)—wrote that the market did not support “humor and characterization,” which
may go some length in explaining story defects. But her writing did “mature”
through this magazine system.
Her first two stories demonstrate the training-wheels
program: “Rocket to Limbo” and “Piety.” The first anticipates the tradition of Galaxy magazine (see also radio programs
like X-Minus-One and the popular TV show The
Twilight Zone)—projecting the present into the near future in a fun,
semi-realistic manner—a now uncommon trend. “Rocket to Limbo” unintentionally
photographs its time period more than future, which is most of the story’s
pleasure. A woman gets an ad—for her eyes only—that she can get rid of her
husband if she follows her instructions. The story begs for a sequel. In fact,
despite the ending suggesting something final, it is only starting to get
interesting. Observe how the characters behave toward one another. Their
response is not the expected one. There’s something intriguing going on between
them that is worth investigating in a second tale (plus, we’d learn about this
new place). If only I’d been her editor...
“Piety” has a wonderful ending which you may or may not
guess, but it goes on too long (despite its brevity) with “human” talking heads
who try to pry the secret of immortality out of an alien. You may well guess
both endings, which are somewhat satisfying, quelled by a less than stellar
technique.
The second pair of stories show promise. “The Gardener”
[reprinted by August Derleth and Michael Parry] feels modern. If I supply the
initial scenario, you’ll guess the outcome: A gardener chops down one of fifty
rare and ancient trees. No one knows why there have always been just fifty.
Still, the ending is killer.
“Child of Void” [reprinted by Groff Conklin and Isaac Asimov]
has a strong child-like voice about a single-parent family that moves to an
area where the laws of physics don’t apply, and the boys find a talking egg.
You cannot guess this ending, which explains the problem to a degree. As the
story has a too-rich complexity that doesn’t gel, so the ending cannot
resonate. It’s interesting, nonetheless, and demonstrates St. Clair’s fertile
imagination. Both stories were collected in St. Clair’s Best of.
Some readers may like “Hathor’s Pets” [reprinted by Groff
Conklin] because the premise is well set up: In a society where women have lost
ground societally, a husband and wife have been transported elsewhere (another
dimension?). They see themselves as pets, so they come up with plans that will
allow them to return to their home. However, the alien treats them as unruly
pets.... But it’s hard to distinguish any of the characters. The intriguing
set-up resonates with the ending only thematically since one idea does not flow
naturally from the other. “Good” politics may not equate to “good” stories, but
it’s interesting, nonetheless.
No comments:
Post a Comment